Consistency Math Kernel™
Consistency Math Kernel™
Consistency Math Kernel™
Deterministic Verification for mathematical correctness
Deterministic certification for mathematical correctness
The Consistency Math Kernel™ (CMK) is a deterministic certification engine for mathematical correctness.
CMK runs at inference time as a certification layer and enforces a strict production contract:
CMK is built for workflows where math must be repeatable, auditable, and safe to automate:
- Certify math inside LLM outputs before downstream execution (pricing, eligibility, disclosures, risk logic).
- Prevent incorrect calculations from entering regulated records, customer communications, or audit trails.
- Harden deterministic decisioning (underwriting thresholds, scoring rules, limits, compliance gates).
- Guardrail agentic/tooling systems by blocking actions triggered by incorrect arithmetic, algebra, probability, or unit conversion.
- Enable safe automation at scale: certified outputs proceed; not certified outcomes route into retry/reformulate/escalation policies.
CMK is certification-first. It is not a generator, and it is not a “best-effort” math tool. It enforces a correct-or-not certified contract suitable for production systems.
| Approach (examples) | Correctness guarantee | Failure mode | Integration posture | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLMs (e.g., GPT/Claude/Gemini) | No deterministic guarantee | Can be confident but wrong on math | Probabilistic generation | Drafting, exploration, candidate generation |
| SMT/SAT solvers (Z3, cvc5, Yices, Boolector) | Strong within formal encodings/theories | Requires precise encoding; scope depends on theory/support | Solver backend / formal methods tool | Constraints, satisfiability, formal verification tasks |
| CAS (Mathematica, Maple, SymPy, SageMath) | High within supported symbolic domains | Rigid input formats; may fail outside scope or on ambiguous NL | Interactive / programmatic math tooling | Symbolic manipulation, exact algebra/calculus workflows |
| Numeric computing (NumPy, SciPy) | High for implemented numeric methods | No semantic verification; requires correct formulation/code | Engineering library | Numerical analysis, optimization, scientific computing |
| CMK™ | Deterministic within certified scope | NOT CERTIFIED when not certifiable (coverage/policy/bounds) | Inference-time certification layer | Correct-or-not certified pipelines for safe automation |
- 560,000 problems evaluated
- 322,694 scored.
- 322,694 certified correct(57.624% coverage)
- Incorrect: 0
- Coverage: 57.6239%
- Runtime: 148.24 seconds
- Average time per problem: 0.2647 ms
- 17,000+ problems evaluated
- Coverage expansion and validation in progress
- 0 incorrect results among answered outputs
- Remaining cases NOT CERTIFIED by design
- 479 problems evaluated
- 257 answered
- 257 certified correct
- Incorrect: 0
- Not certified (abstain): 222
- Coverage: 53.65%
- Runtime: 0.684 seconds
- Average time per problem: 1.428 ms
- Integer/fraction arithmetic & expression evaluation
- Radical (square-root) simplification
- Percentages & proportional reasoning
- Percent of / percent change / discounts
- Rates & ratios
- Unit rate & cost/rate problems
- Measurement & unit conversion
- Unit conversion & time measurement
- Comparison & ordering
- Numeric comparison / min-max selection
- Exact exponentiation and logarithms (supported identities only)
- Linear equations & linear function evaluation
- Systems of linear equations (2×2 / 3×3)
- Binomial expansion
- Polynomial interpolation (Lagrange)
- Quadratics (roots, factoring, Vieta)
- Partial fractions
- Rational simplification / cancellation
- Intervals & absolute value
- Linear/quadratic/rational inequalities & inequality tools
- Differentiation & polynomial calculus
- Trig evaluation / identities within supported scope
- Complex arithmetic (basic)
- Determinants (up to 4×4)
- Diagonalization (2×2 rational)
- Eigenvalues/eigenvectors (2×2)
- Matrix inverse (3×3)
- Matrix powers
- Vector algebra & inequalities
- Area/length on piecewise-linear geometry (polylines)
- Circles & tangency
- Polygons (including regular polygons) & quadrilaterals
- Triangles, similarity, Pythagorean relationships
- Conic sections (including parabolas)
- Lines/segments, point–line relations, coordinate transforms
- Lattice geometry (Pick’s theorem, boundary points)
- Planes, spheres, quadrics, and 3D incidence
- Basic probability, conditional probability & Bayes’ rule
- Discrete distributions (binomial, hypergeometric)
- Expectation / expected value
- Markov chains (basic)
- Descriptive statistics (discrete)
- Diophantine & continued fractions
- Integers: gcd/lcm/division with remainder
- Primes, factorization & squarefree structure
- Wilson-type prime properties
- Congruences, modular arithmetic & CRT
- Euler φ, Carmichael λ, multiplicative order
- Quadratic residues: Legendre/Jacobi, Hensel lifting, square roots mod n
- Discrete logarithm (BSGS / Pohlig–Hellman)
- Arithmetic functions & transforms (Möbius/φ/σ/τ)
- Counting & inclusion–exclusion
- Generating functions (basic)
- Bitset convolutions (AND/OR/XOR)
- Sequences & linear recurrences
The Consistency Math Kernel™ (CMK) is a deterministic certification engine for mathematical correctness.
CMK runs at inference time as a certification layer and enforces a strict production contract:
CMK is built for workflows where math must be repeatable, auditable, and safe to automate:
- Certify math inside LLM outputs before downstream execution (pricing, eligibility, disclosures, risk logic).
- Prevent incorrect calculations from entering regulated records, customer communications, or audit trails.
- Harden deterministic decisioning (underwriting thresholds, scoring rules, limits, compliance gates).
- Guardrail agentic/tooling systems by blocking actions triggered by incorrect arithmetic, algebra, probability, or unit conversion.
- Enable safe automation at scale: certified outputs proceed; not certified outcomes route into retry/reformulate/escalation policies.
CMK is certification-first. It is not a generator, and it is not a “best-effort” math tool. It enforces a correct-or-not certified contract suitable for production systems.
| Approach (examples) | Correctness guarantee | Failure mode | Integration posture | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLMs (e.g., GPT/Claude/Gemini) | No deterministic guarantee | Can be confident but wrong on math | Probabilistic generation | Drafting, exploration, candidate generation |
| SMT/SAT solvers (Z3, cvc5, Yices, Boolector) | Strong within formal encodings/theories | Requires precise encoding; scope depends on theory/support | Solver backend / formal methods tool | Constraints, satisfiability, formal verification tasks |
| CAS (Mathematica, Maple, SymPy, SageMath) | High within supported symbolic domains | Rigid input formats; may fail outside scope or on ambiguous NL | Interactive / programmatic math tooling | Symbolic manipulation, exact algebra/calculus workflows |
| Numeric computing (NumPy, SciPy) | High for implemented numeric methods | No semantic verification; requires correct formulation/code | Engineering library | Numerical analysis, optimization, scientific computing |
| CMK™ | Deterministic within certified scope | NOT CERTIFIED when not certifiable (coverage/policy/bounds) | Inference-time certification layer | Correct-or-not certified pipelines for safe automation |
- 560,000 problems evaluated
- 322,694 scored.
- 322,694 certified correct(57.624% coverage)
- Incorrect: 0
- Coverage: 57.6239%
- Runtime: 148.24 seconds
- Average time per problem: 0.2647 ms
- 17,000+ problems evaluated
- Coverage expansion and validation in progress
- 0 incorrect results among answered outputs
- Remaining cases NOT CERTIFIED by design
- 479 problems evaluated
- 257 answered
- 257 certified correct
- Incorrect: 0
- Not certified (abstain): 222
- Coverage: 53.65%
- Runtime: 0.684 seconds
- Average time per problem: 1.428 ms
- Integer/fraction arithmetic & expression evaluation
- Radical (square-root) simplification
- Percentages & proportional reasoning
- Percent of / percent change / discounts
- Rates & ratios
- Unit rate & cost/rate problems
- Measurement & unit conversion
- Unit conversion & time measurement
- Comparison & ordering
- Numeric comparison / min-max selection
- Exact exponentiation and logarithms (supported identities only)
- Linear equations & linear function evaluation
- Systems of linear equations (2×2 / 3×3)
- Binomial expansion
- Polynomial interpolation (Lagrange)
- Quadratics (roots, factoring, Vieta)
- Partial fractions
- Rational simplification / cancellation
- Intervals & absolute value
- Linear/quadratic/rational inequalities & inequality tools
- Differentiation & polynomial calculus
- Trig evaluation / identities within supported scope
- Complex arithmetic (basic)
- Determinants (up to 4×4)
- Diagonalization (2×2 rational)
- Eigenvalues/eigenvectors (2×2)
- Matrix inverse (3×3)
- Matrix powers
- Vector algebra & inequalities
- Area/length on piecewise-linear geometry (polylines)
- Circles & tangency
- Polygons (including regular polygons) & quadrilaterals
- Triangles, similarity, Pythagorean relationships
- Conic sections (including parabolas)
- Lines/segments, point–line relations, coordinate transforms
- Lattice geometry (Pick’s theorem, boundary points)
- Planes, spheres, quadrics, and 3D incidence
- Basic probability, conditional probability & Bayes’ rule
- Discrete distributions (binomial, hypergeometric)
- Expectation / expected value
- Markov chains (basic)
- Descriptive statistics (discrete)
- Diophantine & continued fractions
- Integers: gcd/lcm/division with remainder
- Primes, factorization & squarefree structure
- Wilson-type prime properties
- Congruences, modular arithmetic & CRT
- Euler φ, Carmichael λ, multiplicative order
- Quadratic residues: Legendre/Jacobi, Hensel lifting, square roots mod n
- Discrete logarithm (BSGS / Pohlig–Hellman)
- Arithmetic functions & transforms (Möbius/φ/σ/τ)
- Counting & inclusion–exclusion
- Generating functions (basic)
- Bitset convolutions (AND/OR/XOR)
- Sequences & linear recurrences


